Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Rjack <[email protected]> writes:
I live in a U.S. jurisdiction... I will continue to legally
interpret the GPL under US copyright law...
You provided a good explanation of why, if you were writing a
license, you might use US-specific language.
But you haven't given a good reason why the FSF, when drafting a
license to be used globally, should make it US-specific.
You have won Rahul!!!
You have totally stumped me. I can't give a good reason for a global
FSF license -- the idea of a globally enforceable copyright license
does not intersect with the reality I live -- but you and the FSF
can keeping trying Rahul . . . there are 195 sovereign jurisdictions
in the world, so do your best.
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
