Rahul Dhesi wrote:
Rjack <[email protected]> writes:
Unfortunately your "fallback" provision, that a failed contract
cannot supply grounds for claims of promissory estoppel, is a
figment of Richard Stallman's fertile imagination...
How do you get promissory estoppel without a promise?
Ummm. . . do you *really* believe that:
"2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1
above . . ." doesn't offer a promise of copyright permissions?
Hmmm. . .
Sincerely,
Rjack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
