amicus_curious wrote: > > "Rahul Dhesi" <[email protected]> wrote in message > news:[email protected]... >> Rjack <[email protected]> writes: >> >> [ still arguing promissory estoppel ] >> >>>> How do you get promissory estoppel without a promise? >> >>>"2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion >>>of it... >> >> Permission alone is not a promise. What is the writer of the GPL >> promising to do or not to do? >> -- > The leap here is the phrase "thus forming a work based on the Program".
The only leap here is the one your two (slightly rotten) braincells are doing -- Another name for a Windows tutorial is crash course _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
