David Kastrup wrote: [...] > In contrast, the GPL does not meet the preconditions for AGB, ...
Go tell it to judges in Munich and Frankfurt. http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_munich_gpl.pdf http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_frankfurt_gpl.pdf http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_muenchen_gpl.pdf http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf > > So in short: you have no clue. Again. Hardly surprising. STOP BEING UTTER MORON, dear GNUtian dak. http://www.jbb.de/urteil_lg_frankfurt_gpl.pdf The relevant part is (see page 11) "Die Lizenzbedingungen des GPL sind als allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen anzusehen, die einer Prüfung nach 305 ff. BGB unterfallen. Da die Lizenzbedingungen des GPL ohne Weiteres im Internet abrufbar sind, bestehen keine Bedenken, dass diese in das Vertragsverhältnis zwischen den Urhebern und der Beklagten einbezogen wurden (§ 305 Abs. 2 Ziff. 2 BGB)." http://www.jbb.de/judgment_dc_frankfurt_gpl.pdf "The conditions [terms] of the license granted under the GPL must be regarded as standard terms and conditions that are subject to Sections 305 et seq. of the German Civil Code (BGB). Since the conditions [terms] of the license granted by the GPL are easily available on the Internet, they were without a doubt incorporated into the contractual relationship between the authors and Defendant (Section 305, Subsection 2, No.2 of the German Civil Code (BGB))." regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
