Rjack <u...@example.net> hat am 13. November 2009 um 00:10 geschrieben:
> Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > 'Evening, Gabriel! > > > > Gabriel Striewe <li...@gabriel-striewe.de> wrote: > >> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: UTF-8, 38 > >> lines --] > > > >> Hello all, > > > >> Python (if I am not right, I am sure there exist other examples > >> of this case) as of now seems to still depend on Visual C being > >> compiled on Windows and still causing problems being compiled > >> with MinGW. > > > > Is that really true? Aren't there any free C compilers native to > > Windows? Hasn't GCC been targeted at Windows native? > > GCC isn't a freely licensed compiler. The GCC compiler is licensed > under the highly restrictive GPL license. > > For a freely licensed C compiler try the pcc compiler at > http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/ . > > You can also try clang at http://clang.llvm.org/ . > > With a year, GCC will be replaced in the superior BSD flavored > operating systems. > But didn't that enable Apple to use most of the software the BSD project has written, without Apple being obliged to give something back? > Sincerely, > Rjack > _______________________________________________ > gnu-misc-discuss mailing list > gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss