Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 2/3/2010 10:42 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > Got it now? > > so substantial and fundamental as to strongly tend to > defeat the object of the parties in making the contract > > Got it now?
What makes you think that the controversial aspects of the GPL is just void/unenforcable nonsense which can be safely ignored by the parties in making the contract? Only enforceable obligations can be breached silly Hyman. The unenforceable nonsense can not be breached and is not part of the contract. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
