On 2/3/2010 11:06 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
What makes you think that the controversial aspects of the GPL is just void/unenforcable nonsense which can be safely ignored by the parties in making the contract?
The fact that companies which have ignored the GPL have been sued and subsequently have come into compliance.
Only enforceable obligations can be breached silly Hyman. The unenforceable nonsense can not be breached and is not part of the contract.
Fortunately, the terms of the GPL are enforceable. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
