Alexander, you're just another OpenBSD zealot who dislikes the fact that OpenBSD is not considered free by FSF's guidelines.
Besides suggesting proprietary software in one of its ports, Theo de Radt explicitly accepts non-free firmware. Besides, OpenBSD uses the revised BSD license for the stated purpose of allowing "commercial use" of its software. That "commercial" actually means proprietary software. I'm not against the revised BSD license or any other non-copyleft free license, but in this case that means they don't see any problem with proprietary software. That means GNU and OpenBSD have different views, so I don't know why so many people from OpenBSD are whining about it being considered non-free by FSF. I've seen your GNG website. Your arguments are ridiculously flawed. You're just another narrow-minded person who dislikes rms because of his beard, his clothes and his philosophy. Please, go whine elsewhere. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss