Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 2/5/2010 1:02 PM, RJack wrote: > > The SFLC filed seven consecutive BusyBox lawsuits without the > > underlying works being registered with the U.S. Copyright Office > > -- this fact rendered those frivolous lawsuits without standing > > to be heard by a federal court: > > And yet, in every single case filed by the SFLC, the defendants > decided to come into compliance with the GPL. Perhaps they know
They "doesnt-know": http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/06/verizon-ceo-doesnt-know-about.html To wit, Verizon is still blatantly breaching the GPL at http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp and the complaint about it http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/dec/07/busybox/verizon.pdf "11. Upon information and belief, Verizon distributes to its customers the Actiontec MI424WR wireless router (Infringing Product), which contains embedded executable software (Firmware). Defendant also provides the Firmware corresponding to the Infringing Product for download viaits website, at http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp." was dismissed with prejudice against plaintiffs without any settlement -- no agreement with the defendant. Stop being utter MORON Hyman. regards, alexander. -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss