Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> writes: > On 2/5/2010 1:50 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: >> They "doesnt-know": >> http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/06/verizon-ceo-doesnt-know-about.html > > As I've said before, everyone agrees that the GPL is > a perfectly valid copyright license,
Oh, I disagree. The GPL does not touch or regulate copyright. It is a license that gives you rights that copyright would not. "Copyright" is a law. You can't license it. There are _contracts_ (like the Microsoft EULA) that try to get a party to _relinquish_ rights it would have under copyright. _That_ sort of "license" tampers with copyright. The GPL does not. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
