On 2/8/2010 10:55 AM, RJack wrote:
"authorizing others to authorize" simply doesn't appear in 17 USC sec. 106 delineating the rights of owners of copyrights. Only in your Marxist land of GNU are copyright laws written that way.
It's amazing that you GPL skeptics don't realize how absurd your arguments are. Were you correct, which you are not, any printing house working for a publisher would be violating the copyright of an author who had contracted with the publisher to publish his book. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
