On 2/22/2010 4:33 PM, RJack wrote:
the entirely unremarkable principle that “uses” that violate a license agreement constitute copyright infringement only when those uses would infringe in the absence of any license agreement at all
Yes. And the use here is copying and distribution, which infringes in the absence of any license agreement at all.
(ND CA)
Of what use is it to quote a district court ruling that was overturned on appeal? _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
