RJack <u...@example.net> wrote: > Hyman Rosen wrote: > I've told you a hundred times that the Jacobsen appeals court panel > violated CAFC rules.
If you were correct, a single time would suffice. Here's the *valid* opinion: [ .... ] Sorry, Rjack, by definition the opinion of that appeals court is the valid one. Why can't you simply admit you've been mistaken on this issue for quite a long time? No shame in that, even the lower court got it wrong to begin with. > Sincerely, > RJack :) -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
