On 3/1/2010 4:57 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Hyman Rosen<hyro...@mail.com> writes:
Having a copyright notice attached to the work defeats such a claim.
No, that has nothing to do with it.
Wrong. 17 USC 401(d) says:
<http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap4.html#401>
(d) Evidentiary Weight of Notice. — If a notice of copyright
in the form and position specified by this section appears on
the published copy or copies to which a defendant in a copyright
infringement suit had access, then no weight shall be given to
such a defendant's interposition of a defense based on innocent
infringement in mitigation of actual or statutory damages,
except as provided in the last sentence of section 504(c)(2).
(The exception isn't relevant here.) And the Fifth Circuit just
decided that "had access" means that a copy with copyright notice
exists and is generally available, and it is not necessary to show
that the defendant saw and was aware of such a notice, for the
innocent infringer defense to be disallowed.
<http://beckermanlegal.com/pdf/?file=/Lawyer_Copyright_Internet_Law/maverick_harper_100225FifthCirDecis.pdf>
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
