David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > > > David Kastrup wrote: > > [...] > >> Taking something in a supermarket without paying constitutes theft. The > >> relevant activity of the theft is done at the time I take the ware, the > >> status of the theft is established when I pass the cash register. > > > > Uh stupid dak. You're mistaken. > > > > http://www.frag-einen-anwalt.de/forum_topic.asp?topic_id=37040 > > We have other actions establishing the intent of the persons here. But > anyway, you'll notice that only the "Anwalt" talks about complete theft, > while the only relevant opinion is that of the court, and the court does > not talk about theft in its description of the complaint, but "the > taking of a non-own moveable object from somebody else with the intent > of making it his own against the law".
Uh moron dak. http://dejure.org/gesetze/StGB/242.html http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diebstahl regards, alexander. P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system so that I can do the builds." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss