Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > Hyman Rosen wrote: >> >> On 3/9/2010 11:50 AM, RJack wrote: >> > "... but that's not relevant". Neither is your analogy. >> >> You're wrong about that (naturally). The original conversation was >> On 3/2/2010 10:43 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: >> > David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Taking something in a supermarket without paying constitutes theft. The >> >> relevant activity of the theft is done at the time I take the ware, the >> >> status of the theft is established when I pass the cash register. >> > Uh stupid dak. You're mistaken. >> >> As usual, Terekhov was wrong, and the Colorado case is an >> example which demonstrates this. Borrowing a DVD from a >> library is a legal act. Borrowing a DVD from a library and >> failing to return it . . . > > Uh moron Hyman. Let comrade dak translate the following for you: > > Zwangsvollstreckung (ยงยง 704 - 945 ZPO)
No need to bother. It is utterly irrelevant to anything discussed so far. Not that this should surprise anybody... -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss