Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 3/10/2010 11:18 AM, RJack wrote:
Sigh... That's nothing new. If conditions precedent are not
satisfied in a proprietary license the same thing results. The
Artistic license had no conditions precedent -- only covenants. One
erroneous decision by a non-precedental court is hardly a victory.
The CAFC's clear error can never harm anyone other than Katzer.
It's only an error when a court superior to CAFC declares it such.
Until then, it stands.
Limited strictly to one defendant in a nation of 310 million.
ROFL
Sincerely,
RJack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
