On 3/10/2010 12:21 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license-2.0.php
doesn't even use the magic word "condition"!
So much about CAFC's
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf
"The Artistic License states on its face that the document creates
conditions: "The intent of this document is to state the _conditions_
under which a Package may be copied." (Emphasis added.)"
It still contains "provided that", which
<http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf>
Under California contract law, "provided that"
typically denotes a condition.
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
