On 3/25/2010 12:33 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Wow. Hyman, I agree with you 100% with the caveat that static
> linking doesn't change anything. It's mere aggregation
Your agreement or disagreement is irrelevant, since even when your conclusions are correct you seldom arrive at them through correct reasoning. Your error with respect to static linking is an example; a statically linked program is not a mere aggregation of its components. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
