On 2010-03-25 06:06:09 -0400, Andrew Haley said:
There's nothing ironic about it. The FSF seeks to maximize freedom, so licenses code whichever way works best. Libraries sometimes have different needs from applications.
Which is why I suggest that Pascal's lisp libraries would be more useful licensed under the LLGPL than the GPL. It's ironic because the FSF is the creator of the GPL, and even they recognized that the GPL was a poor fit for libraries which is why they created the Library (now Lesser) GPL.
-- Raffael Cavallaro _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
