Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/9/2010 12:12 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://www.bitlaw.com/source/17usc/109.html
The First Sale doctrine has nothing to do with copyright infringement
of GPL-covered works, except in its usual sense. In particular, a
copy of a GPL-covered work made for use does not become a copy which
may be transferred under 17 USC 109 without the GPL being honored,
any more than a time-shifted recording made for personal use is such
a copy.
Do you dream up this tripe without anyone's help? You're
showing real originality in your imaginings.
Sincerely,
RJack :)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
