Hyman Rosen wrote: [...] > > It is the job of the trier of fact to compare the *registered* work with > > the alleged infringing copy for "substantial similarity". In the instant > > suit, no binary has been *registered* for comparison with the alleged > > infringing binary. I'll leave it to you to explain how a jury would > > compare a work that you *refuse* to identify with *specificity* with > > some *alleged* infringing work. > > No, this is false. You really are ignorant in this subject. > <http://ipmall.info/hosted_resources/CopyrightCompendium/chapter_0300.asp>
Uh retard Hyman. "324 Deposit for registration: identifying material. Where a computer program is fixed or published only in the form of machine-readable copies, the deposit for registration purposes shall consist of one copy of identifying portions of the pro- gram, reproduced in a form visually perceptible without the aid of a machine or device, either on paper or in microform. For these purposes, "identifying portions" shall mean either the first and last 25 pages or equivalent units of the program if reproduced on paper, or at least the first and last 25 pages or equivalent units of the program if reproduced in microform, to- gether with the page or equivalent unit contain- ing the copyright notice, if any. See 37 C.F.R. 202.20(c)(2)(vii). If the computer pro- gram is less than 50 pages in length, the entire program should be deposited. For registration of a derivative computer program, identifying portions of the new material should be included in the deposit. NOTE: Works fixed or published in both machine-readable and visually-perceptible form are not considered machine-readable works for purposes of deposit for registration. The appropriate deposit requirements for the visually-perceptible form apply. See section 806.12 of Chapter 800: DEPOSIT FOR REGISTRA- TION." regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss