p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) writes:

> In-house use would be outside of the scope of the GPL, since no
> "distribution" would occur.

This means that in-house "distribution" to employees would not count as
distribution in the GPL sense.  OK, this might indeed be the most
reasonable point of view.

Nicolas
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Reply via email to