p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) writes: > In-house use would be outside of the scope of the GPL, since no > "distribution" would occur.
This means that in-house "distribution" to employees would not count as distribution in the GPL sense. OK, this might indeed be the most reasonable point of view. Nicolas _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss