Nicolas Neuss <lastn...@kit.edu> writes: > p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) writes: > >> In-house use would be outside of the scope of the GPL, since no >> "distribution" would occur. > > This means that in-house "distribution" to employees would not count as > distribution in the GPL sense. OK, this might indeed be the most > reasonable point of view.
Yes, definitely. First, the most efficient companies won't have any "distribution". The new software would be instealled on the file server, and everybody could use it from here. And even in the less efficient companies, employees don't install softwarem (it's the job of the IT jockeys). -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
