Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> On 5/5/2010 10:52 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > rejected not allowed unenforceable NOT a proof can NOT be ignored
>
> That's enough multiple negatives to open a wormhole to the crank
> universe of twist and spin. Your fellow crank asked for a judge
> who does not believe the terms of the GPL can be ignored. I gave
> him a judge who does not believe the terms of the GPL can be
> ignored ("I am not persuaded ... that the release of the ...
> source code ... didn't cure the breach.") None of your twisting
She is simply saying that the GPL provision of "automatic termination"
on a slightest breach is UNENFORCEABLE you idiot.
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."
Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
