Hyman Rosen wrote: > > On 5/5/2010 10:52 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > > rejected not allowed unenforceable NOT a proof can NOT be ignored > > That's enough multiple negatives to open a wormhole to the crank > universe of twist and spin. Your fellow crank asked for a judge > who does not believe the terms of the GPL can be ignored. I gave > him a judge who does not believe the terms of the GPL can be > ignored ("I am not persuaded ... that the release of the ... > source code ... didn't cure the breach.") None of your twisting
She is simply saying that the GPL provision of "automatic termination" on a slightest breach is UNENFORCEABLE you idiot. regards, alexander. P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the originality standards required by copyright law." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress." Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate' -- http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss