David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup wrote:
> > [...]
> >> If she considers a breach ...
> >
> > She did NOT rule that there was a breach, you retard. She ruled quite
> > the opposite:
> >
> > "With respect to the General Public License ("GPL"), MYSQL has
> > not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the
> > merits or irreparable harm."
>
> You are confusing the decision about the preliminary injunction with the
I'm confusing noting, silly dak.
"With respect to the General Public License ("GPL"), MYSQL has
not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the
merits or irreparable harm."
HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED
*HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED*, YOU IDIOT.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_proof
And yes, the case was about alleged contract breach, you retard. NOT
COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT, YOU MORON.
http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/MySQLcounterclaim.pdf
("COUNT VIII Breach of Contract (GPL License)")
" COUNT VIII
Breach of Contract (GPL License)"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
regards,
alexander.
P.S. "Every computer program in the world, BusyBox included, exceeds the
originality standards required by copyright law."
Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
P.P.S. "Of course correlation implies causation! Without this
fundamental principle, no science would ever make any progress."
Hyman Rosen <[email protected]> The Silliest GPL 'Advocate'
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
_______________________________________________
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
