David Kastrup wrote: > > Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: > > > Hyman Rosen wrote: > > > > [... attorneys' fees to Best Buy Inc. counsel ... ] > > > >> According to the document that AT posted, <http://terekhov.de/204.pdf>: > >> Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, plaintiffs > >> Software Freedom Conservancy, Inc. and Erik Anderson and defendant > >> BEST BUY CO.,INC hereby dismiss their claims against each other from > >> within this action WITH PREJUDICE with respect to any past claims for > >> certain Insignia Blu-ray products (NS-WBRDVD, NS-BRDVD3, NS-BRHTIB, > >> NS-BRDVD3-CA, NS-WBRDVD2, NS-BRDVD4, NS-BRDVD4-CA, NS-BRDVD, > >> NS-2BRDVD, > >> and NS-BDLIVB01) and without costs to any party. Plaintiffs maintain > >> this action against all other defendants. > >> > >> Why do you claim, in contradiction to this document, that SFLC > >> paid any costs to Best Buy? > > > > Not in contradiction. Court costs != attorney's fees. Apples and > > oranges, Hyman. > > So the payments are just your personal fantasies again, made up to match > your impressively off-skew view of legal matters.
I made no claims regarding payments, silly. I just pointed out that such payments are not in contradiction. regards, alexander. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss