Back in August 2011: "08/08/2011 211 OPINION AND ORDER: For the aforementioned reasons stated above, plaintiffs' motion to hold WD in contempt of this Court's earlier injunction against WDE pursuant to Rule 65( d) is granted. Counsel is ordered to submit information regarding WD's ability to pay and plaintiffs' lost profits within fifteen (15) days of the issuance of this Opinion and Order. Plaintiffs are directed to submit a fee application by the same date. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (docket # 172). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 8/8/2011) (js) Modified on 8/9/2011 (jab). (Entered: 08/09/2011) "
08/08/2011 211 OPINION AND ORDER: http://terekhov.de/211.pdf Now in 2012: "01/05/2012 232 ORDER: The August 8, 2011 Order in this matter is hereby vacated. The Clerk of the Court is directed to withdraw this entry (Docket No. 211) from the docket. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 1/5/2012) (js) (Entered: 01/06/2012)" 01/05/2012 232 ORDER: http://terekhov.de/232.pdf Hmmm... sounds not good for GNUtards... regards, alexander. -- http://web.archive.org/web/20090626051346/http://gng.z505.com/index.htm (GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards too, whereas GNU cannot.) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
