In a discussion on another list ([email protected]), I asked about the inclusion of a software in GNU. One of the things that was said RMS:
"Si es capaz también de funcionar dentro del Hurd, de manera que sirva con cualquier núcleo, en ese caso puede ser un paquete GNU." Translation: "If it is able to function within Hurd, so that serves to any kernel in this case may be a packet GNU" So why do I say that a program for GNU/Linux. In reality there is a program for the GNU system, which also works with Linux. As GNU/Linux, a variant of the GNU system. Because it could be GNU/Hurd, which opine about it? If a program does not depend essentially Linux. We should mention that it is a program for GNU instead of GNU/Linux? I am aware that the GNU system depends on a kernel, but this can be Hurd. _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
