-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-08 at 16:38, Fabio Gonzalez wrote:
> So why do I say that a program for GNU/Linux. In reality there is a > program for the GNU system, which also works with Linux. As GNU/Linux, > a variant of the GNU system. Because it could be GNU/Hurd, which opine > about it? If a program does not depend essentially Linux. We should > mention that it is a program for GNU instead of GNU/Linux? Indeed, saying just "GNU" does not place undue emphasis on Linux; personally I try to do that when appropriate. If you can spend some more words you can also say explicitly "GNU with any kernel" or "GNU/Linux and GNU/Hurd". Regards, - -- Luca Saiu Home page: http://www-lipn.univ-paris13.fr/~saiu My blog: http://ageinghacker.net/blog GNU epsilon: http://www.gnu.org/software/epsilon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlBLgeAACgkQvzOavibF0ob2CwCeNQAioy+rZxSR/oZZfDc0RwMn HrMAnRmA+f/18Ae+GK/mXaz77LbtdjCx =arrc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
