On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:19:04 +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote... > Providing access to copyrighted work with permission to make copies > directly by recipients instead of 'trading' material objects with > copyrighted work fixed on/in them doesn't change the status of copies > lawfully made
What it doesn't change is the fact that whether they are "lawfully made" is irrelevant. > (no matter who made them) and owned by strangers with > respect to copyright and further distribution under doctrine of > exhaustion -- in both cases copies fall under exception to the exclusive > distribution right. It follows that that's wrong too. I've given you the reasons for all this many times over. I'm not going to repeat them any further. -- Tim Jackson news@timjackson.invalid (Change '.invalid' to '.plus.com' to reply direct) _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
