>>>>> Alexander Terekhov <terek...@web.de> writes: >>>>> Tim Jackson wrote:
>> (Hint: Differences include the fact that one uses the term "lawfully >> made" while the other doesn't. Similarities include the fact that >> both relate only to the sale or transfer or other disposal of "that >> copy". Not to the creation of new copies from it.) [...] > again: creation of new copies in the case of GCC is perfectly fine > and unrestricted thanks to the GPL's reproduction permission. It isn't. ... /Until/ (and /unless/) one /accepts/ GNU GPL (with /all/ its permissions and restrictions) first. Should a copy be made that doesn't comply with /all/ the GNU GPL conditions (such as: a binary made from a modified source without that source being made available) -- it's an infringing copy, which one is /not/ allowed to distribute (AIUI) under either doctrine. Thus... Long live copyleft! [...] PS. And thanks Tim Jackson for the valuable comments on the subject. -- FSF associate member #7257 _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss