On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:16 AM František Kučera <konfere...@frantovo.cz> wrote:
> The problem with this approach is the risk of hostile takeover. There > are corporations (e.g. those that profit from proprietary > software/cloud) ... that have almost unlimited > (from our point of view) financial and developers resources – which > allows them to bend such organization according to their needs. > > So if this is to have a chance of success, there must be a rigid > (immutable) constitution which guarantees the principles in the long > term. ... > <https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html>. Maybe they should be > transformed into a constitutional document (while retaining the original > meaning, of course). > Franta, I made suggestions, days ago, about a constitution for GNU. Let's work on this suggestion. Adrienne -- Freedom - no pane, all gaiGN! GNU C-Graph - http://www.gnu.org/software/c-graph Code Art Now - http://codeartnow.com Abertheid Campaign - http://www.abertheid.info Follow me on Twitter @AdrienneGT @GNUcgraph
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
