Andy Wingo writes:
>> Who is “we” in “we have decided” above? > > I don't think this question has been answered. Brandon, could you > clarify please? >> Can you explain how “moderation was being used in a biased manner”, >> giving specific examples? > > I am also interested in answers to this question. I do not intend to discuss internal GNU matters on a public mailing list. > For what it is worth, until now I could understand that you were > operating in good faith in your various roles in GNU, that you were > genuinely working for the benefit of GNU, even if we disagreed on the > advisability of different options. I am sad to say that I no longer > feel this way. It's not impossible to work together, but something has > broken. I'm sorry you have interpreted it that way. I have been working tirelessly to keep peace since you created this mess a few weeks ago. Please keep in mind that "something was broken" for me the moment all of you took up arms against GNU. I have nevertheless tried to work around that feeling on order to find some common ground. I firmly believe in the importance of being able to work with people with whom one fundamentally disagrees. But ironically, in working to maintain peace, I cannot please everyone all the time. I will continue to act toward the betterment of GNU, and sometimes that might conflict with your own interpretation of the situation. I am sorry for that but I hope that we can eventually navigate our way towards a resolution. -- -brandon
