"Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]> wrote: > It is fairly well-known that Google ranks newer material above older > material. Historic areas of the web are basically in a black hole as far as > the Google search is concerned. > > And since many people reach for the Google search engine without even > thinking there might be alternatives, those areas of the web basically don't > exist.
That is, there are some websearch providers that do not rank new and updated articles higher? Why do not they, I wonder? It looks like a pretty sane choice.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
