[Please note: Something happened with your MUA and your letter had fallen off the thread.]
Akira Urushibata <[email protected]> wrote: > On 28 May 2020 Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: >> "Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It is fairly well-known that Google ranks newer material above older >>> material. Historic areas of the web are basically in a black hole as far >>> as the Google search is concerned. >>> >>> And since many people reach for the Google search engine without even >>> thinking there might be alternatives, those areas of the web basically >>> don't exist. >> >> That is, there are some websearch providers that do not rank new and updated >> articles higher? Why do not they, I wonder? It looks like a pretty sane >> choice. > > Other conditions being equal, a websearch will rank a newer document above an > older one. But the other conditions are never equal. Yes-yes, sure. My question was rather about those ‘alternatives’, mentioned by @[email protected], that treat dusty areas of the web better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
