On Tuesday, 8 August 2000, Tom Cato Amundsen writes:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> >
> > On Tuesday, 8 August 2000, Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > > Someone please test this version of mudela-book, I usually screw
> > > > up code when I touch it.
> > > >
> > > > * --read-lys option, now you can do:
> > > > mudela-book file.texi
> > > > convert-mudela
> > > > mudela-book --read-lys
> > > > * --outdir=DIR will put ALL output into DIR
> > >
> > > > * @mudela[filename="myfilename"]{c d e f g}
> > >
> > > If we have this, the code that counts sections etc (when use_hash ==
> > > 0) should be junked.
> >
> > I disagree. You might want to name longer examples, but want
> > mudela-book to generate names for short fragments. use_hash
> > should be made user-switchable first, of course.
> >
> > Jan.
> I'm a little confused...
> If mudela-book generates hash file names for all examples, except
> those you name explicitly, what do you need the
> chap-sect-num.ly file names for?
I've mailed with Han-Wen, it turned out that I misunderstood his message.
He wanted to say: junk the option (use_hash == 0). But I thought: what
names should we generate *when* (use_hash == 0) is used, if filename="mfn"
is not available for that fragment.
Sorry for the confusion
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
