On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 12:41:05PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:36:02AM -0000, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
> > > When an note with an accidental is tied over the bar line, and then
> > > the a note of the same pitch as the tied one occurs in the new bar, I
> > > think it's common practice to repeat the accidental. Lily .84 doesn't
> > > do this:
> > I disagree. Strongly.
>
> Scott is right, but I think you misunderstood him.
>
> | | | |
> #x | x #x
> \ ---/
>
My mistake, I thought Scott wanted an accidental on the second note.
> note the accidental on the 3rd note. The 2nd one doesn't get an accidental.
> --
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
>
--
Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GNU Solfege - free eartraining, http://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/
