[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > you can change this using Ghostscript's -r option.) We
> > intend to mostly fix this by the end of 1998.
>
> What ancient ghostscript version do you use? Since version 6.0,
> Ghostscript handles Type1 fonts without any problem.
I think 5.5 is the latest GNU ghostscript; anyway, it's standard with
Redhat 7.
> > Perhaps you can try with Adobe Distiller if you really need good PDF
> > files.
>
> It won't give any better output as long as the feta fonts
> in the Postscript file are bitmapped. As soon as we can
> produce Type1 versions of the fonts, the PDF files will
> be perfect. Now, you get fuzzy-looking note symbols on
> the screen since they are bitmapped.
Can you try what happens if you use -f ps output of lily?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
_______________________________________________
Gnu-music-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-music-discuss
