The people at the guile irc channel asked me for some performance tests in gnucash comparing gnucash/guile1.8 vs gnucash/guile2.0.
I thought our GnuCash devs could be interested as well, so here goes: I have conducted two tests: 1. run make check 20 times in the src/report/standard-reports directory. I have chosen that directory because the tests are fairly heavy and almost purely in scheme. So the time to run the tests is a good indicator of the relative performance of the two guile versions. 2. start gnucash --nofile a couple of times in a row and time how long it takes to display the main window. This is not a very accurate test - I looked at the wall clock to measure this. But startup time is something users are sensitive to, so it would be interesting to check for improvements. Note that guile 2 now compiles its source files. This happens automatically whenever a file is newer than the last compiled version. For an installed gnucash, this should happen only once (at first startup) and hence is not representative of the user's experience. So for the gnucash/guile 2 test, I have first run make check and started the application once before doing my performance tests. As such, (one time) compile times are not part of the test results. The results: 20x standard-reports tests: - guile 1.8: real: 3m59s user: 2m40s sys: 0m9s - guile 2.0: real: 2m48s user: 1m45s sys: 0m11s Startup time (wall clock time to show main window, test run 3 times at least) Average time is given: - guile 1.8: 13s (consistently) - guile 2.0: 9s (consistently) That means that guile 2 improves the test performance with about 30% compared with guile 1.8 and reduces the startup time with about 30% as well. That's a nice improvement we get for free without even optimizing our own code IMO :) Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
