On Wednesday 27 November 2013 07:04:01 John Ralls wrote: > On Nov 27, 2013, at 3:31 AM, Geert Janssens <janssens-ge...@telenet.be> wrote: > > > > Quick poll: > > - do you agree ? > > - if so, when should we do it ? > > - and is there something that you think should still be backported > > before the release ? > Yes, I think we should do a final 2.4 release at the same time we do > 2.6, and yes we should backport the libxml workaround. > That timing is fine with me. It would be the latest possible moment IMO if we intend to switch to git at the same time as well. I'm not sure the windows build server can build 2.4 images from git.
> BTW, I don't do special Mac releases unless I've messed up a bundle or > someone finds a serious problem in Gtk-quartz. In either case I'll > still use the latest released Gnucash tarball and just change the > trailing version number on the dmg, e.g. Gnucash-Intel-2.4.13-2.dmg. > Ok, good to know. Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
