On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:20:51 -0700 John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote:
> Then I can make a C++ class and move the functionality into > it one function at a time, converting the C function to a wrapper > with C linkage. I can test that against the existing C tests, add C++ > tests, and move on to the next function. The rest of GnuCash can't > tell anything's changed; new work now has two versions of the API to > use depending on whether it's completely new or a modification of > existing. If it comes time to start the release cycle and the > conversion isn't complete, we can ship it as-is because nothing's > broken. It sounds good *in theory*, but I'm not so sure you're going to rewrite engine and get rid of cruft this way. Still, as a happy GC user, I wish you all success. For the sake of experiment I briefly tried KMyMoney anticipating that (maybe) KDE could fill the need, but *very* quickly I was back to xfce/i3/Gnucash. :-) Sincerely, Gour -- An intelligent person does not take part in the sources of misery, which are due to contact with the material senses. O son of Kuntī, such pleasures have a beginning and an end, and so the wise man does not delight in them.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
