On Thursday 14 August 2014 10:04:55 Gour wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 17:20:51 -0700 > > John Ralls <jra...@ceridwen.us> wrote: > > Then I can make a C++ class and move the functionality into > > it one function at a time, converting the C function to a wrapper > > with C linkage. I can test that against the existing C tests, add > > C++ > > tests, and move on to the next function. The rest of GnuCash can't > > tell anything's changed; new work now has two versions of the API to > > use depending on whether it's completely new or a modification of > > existing. If it comes time to start the release cycle and the > > conversion isn't complete, we can ship it as-is because nothing's > > broken. > > It sounds good *in theory*, but I'm not so sure you're going to > rewrite engine and get rid of cruft this way. > > Still, as a happy GC user, I wish you all success. > > For the sake of experiment I briefly tried KMyMoney anticipating that > (maybe) KDE could fill the need, but *very* quickly I was back to > xfce/i3/Gnucash. :-) > Off topic for this thread - I'd love to hear what were the things you liked about KMyMoney and what you found missing. Can I ask you to share your experience in another e-mail thread on gnucash-user ?
It would IMO be very valuable feedback for gnucash to learn about it's strengths and weaknesses. Feel free to mention I asked about this if you start such a topic. Thanks, Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucash-devel@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
