Tony Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi folks
>
> How about this one? Give it a go Thomas and let me know if it
> works. (dont know if I am supposed/allowed to post patches to this
> list?)
Patches are ok here when you want others to test them or look at them,
but patches meant to actually be applied should at least be cc'd to
gnucash-patches. Alternatively you can file a bug report and supply
your patch. Either way works, IMHO.
> Derek, regarding whether it is essential it is the printer interface,
> which changed from 2.0. I am not certain but I think RH 9 comes with
> 2.0.
Then we need to retain support for 2.0.
> Anyway, glad if it is 2.2 that we are aiming at. The only
> compatability problem I have had so far is this printer problem. Which
> hopefully will now be fixed. Any ideas on how to do it without
> breaking it for users of 2.0?
You need to add a configure test and #ifdef the code based on whether
you find 2.0 or 2.2.
> Tony
[patch snipped]
This patch only replaced 2.0 with 2.2, which is not sufficient.
You'll need to use some #ifdefs based on a proper test in
configure.in.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key available
_______________________________________________
gnucash-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gnucash.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
