On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:19:23AM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > I don't know if there's a licensing issue or not in regards to having a > file include/inclusion with such key, so I'll just keep my mouth closed > for now on that matter. :)
I am sure that many will not be so coy and keep their mouths shut! > Perhaps, though, instead of requiring a file include/inclusion that > would theoretically have the key, perhaps one could make the program > accept an optional configuration (or build) option that expects for the > string containing the key (not necessarily a file). Of course, this must > also be carefully studied because I don't know if there is a licensing > issue with this (or furthermore, a software freedom issue). This is all going to depend on what HMRC deem acceptable. The technical bit is going to be the easy part. -- Alain Williams Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer. +44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/ Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php #include <std_disclaimer.h> _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
