> On Jun 28, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Dale Alspach <alspac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Today I was reconciling an account and noticed a peculiar behavior.
> 
> Typically I check heavily used credit and bank accounts online a few
> times a month. At that time I mark transactions cleared "c" which have
> appeared online. When a statement comes I usually clear any additional
> transactions appearing on the statement and then click Reconcile.
> 
> Today I marked a transaction but apparently did not hit "enter" or move
> off the transaction before hitting Reconcile.
> 
> In the Reconcile window this transaction was not marked cleared so I
> marked it and finished the reconciliation. To my surprise this
> transaction was not marked "y". This seems to me to be a bug. It could
> easily confuse a user and foul subsequent reconciliations.
> 
> A possible resolution would be to have "Reconcile" pop up the "save or
> discard changes" message, when there have been modifications, before
> opening the reconcile window. Second, if a transaction is marked in the
> reconcile window and the reconcile is finished, all reconciled
> transactions should be marked "y" in the register regardless of previous
> state.

It might not be intuitive but it's not a bug: You've started an edit on the 
transaction but the changes you've made aren't visible to the rest of the 
program until you commit them by moving to another transaction, nor can any 
other part of the program edit it.

The suggestion that reconciling an account should be permitted only if the 
account has no transactions being edited is reasonable and should prevent both 
problems.

Regards,
John Ralls

_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see 
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.

Reply via email to