John, Victor.
Thanks for the replies. I will have to look at how I have GnuCash
configured to see if check printing is an option. I am thinking it is a
business feature so may not be available to the simple setup I have. I
will look later today.
The problem I see with the three-up checks I have is I only write one or
maybe two checks every other month. Not sure if my printer will handle
the one left over from the three up. Something else to research.
I am considering moving to a different banking organization so would
need to order new checks so a suggestion as to brand would still be
appreciated.
Rod
--
On 11/23/19 11:48 AM, John Ralls wrote:
On Nov 23, 2019, at 10:35 AM, Roderick Anderson <raander...@gmail.com> wrote:
Good Day.
The organization I am treasurer for currently has three-up checks that I fill
out by hand.
We typically only use 10 or less a year and I have plenty on hand but I would
prefer not hand writing them out. I don't need GnuCash to print the checks but
do need something that is usable from LibreOffice - ready made template?
My research (Google) turns some up but everyone mentions being compatible with
commercial accounting software. Probably so they can be printed from the
software. Since I do not need that I would still like any thoughts or
suggestions for a good brand.
GnuCash can print 3-up voucher checks, see
https://www.gnucash.org/docs/v3/C/gnucash-help/print-check.html. The only
reason not to use it would be if you get checks that don't have the MICR
routing id and account number pre-printed on them, but if you're currently
filling them out by hand you must already have those.
Regards,
John Ralls
_______________________________________________
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe:
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user
If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see
https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information.
-----
Please remember to CC this list on all your replies.
You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
