Sorry, I had that reversed clicking Reply All: puts gnucash-u...@lists.gnucash.org <mailto:gnucash-u...@lists.gnucash.org> in the cc: field, and the sender in the To: field.
On 2020 Nov 18, at 11-18 12:17:03, w...@theprescotts.com wrote: Adrien, For your reference, in the MacOS Mail.app: clicking Reply: puts the sender in the To: field clicking Reply All: puts gnucash-u...@lists.gnucash.org <mailto:gnucash-u...@lists.gnucash.org> in the To: field, and the sender in the cc: field. Usually what I do is hit 'Reply All', delete the sender from the To: field and drag gnucash from cc: to To:. Regards, Will On 2020 Nov 18, at 11-18 11:30:15, Adrien Monteleone <adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net <mailto:adrien.montele...@lusfiber.net>> wrote: I'll add Mail.app on MacOS to the list. The 'From:' header has a down arrow to the right of the address. (visible on hover) Clicking it brings up a context menu with 'New Mail' as an option. (There is also a 'Copy Address' option if one prefers) As well, any address in the body of a message has the same options. Not certain about Mail.app on iOS, but I'd suspect there is a similar feature. Regards, Adrien On 11/18/20 3:38 AM, Geert Janssens wrote: > You make a very good point here. I agree the list configuration should > reflect our default > behaviour. And given all mail clients I have seen make it easy to send a mail > or reply to any > visible header e-mail address (To, CC, From,...), the uncommon case of a > private request is still > readily available, but it does take explicit action. Making the desired > behaviour default is > actually good user experience. > For the record these are the mail clients I have looked at: > - Kmail: provides direct reply to or new message to any visible address. > - Thunderbird: provides new message to any visible address > - GMail: provides new message to any visible address, though it does take an > extra click > - K9-Mail (mobile): provides direct sending new mail to "from" address rather > than reply-to > address. Other visible addresses can't be targeted directly. > I'm extrapolating from this that any decent mail client has effectively a way > to directly send a > message to the address that appears in the from field instead of using the > hidden reply-to. > So to me the original argument that it would be much harder to send a private > reply doesn't > hold. > In fact as one on the other side of regularly receiving unwarranted private > replies on my list > posts, I actually prefer to make that process a bit harder (while still not > difficult at all). _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org <mailto:gnucash-user@gnucash.org> To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
