Hmm, my mail client insists on munging part of my original message on re- sending, so here's a manually edited one with my full comment...
Op zondag 7 maart 2021 20:39:00 CET schreef John Ralls: > Not offhand, but it's quite possible that adding symbol fixes the problem. > Did you try gnc-fq-helper, and if so what was its output? > On a tangent, why does gnucash require a symbol key ? The full hash keys also have the symbol name, albeit in a weird format that can be converted into a proper two-dimensional hash without too much trouble. I'm doing that in my work in progress branch: https://github.com/gjanssens/gnucash/blob/ c847fa3aa4a5f90fa4dbf93673d3668e9ddc9e22/libgnucash/quotes/finance-quote- wrapper.in#L107 What would be the potential issues if we decided to make the symbol key optional, assuming we also fix the code to use the symbol part of the hash keys of course ? Regards, Geert _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user If you are using Nabble or Gmane, please see https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists for more information. ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.