Are you aware that the transaction report already has the option to display not the document path itself but a mark that there is a linked document? It just shows L to the left of the amount column when there is a document (with a link to it when you click on the L). If there isn't a document then it stays blank. It's the link checkbox on the display option to enable this.
Changing the code to replace the L with the actual document path is relatively easy but whether this change would make it to the actual official release I can't say. It's yet another option in an already long list of options. I can certainly propose the chance but can't guarantee it would be accepted. The alternative would be to implement this in a custom report. I am happy to help with that but only if the current L / no L option is not enough, and only if you are comfortable installing a custom report. https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Custom_Reports#Loading_Your_Report Sincerely, Vincent Dawans On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 2:19 PM Brook Milligan <br...@nmsu.edu> wrote: > Is there any way to include the path to linked documents in a, for > example, transaction report? > > While this is not a normal financial need, it would be really helpful for > auditing that transaction information is complete. For example, it would > be useful for finding transactions that lack corresponding documentation to > eliminate mistakes. > > Thanks a lot. > > Cheers, > Brook > > _______________________________________________ > gnucash-user mailing list > gnucash-user@gnucash.org > To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: > https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user > ----- > Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. > You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All. > _______________________________________________ gnucash-user mailing list gnucash-user@gnucash.org To update your subscription preferences or to unsubscribe: https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-user ----- Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.
